Critique of Media Terminology in Epstein Files Coverage

On Epstein files:
1. Why is the press referring to girls as women?
2. Why is the press inventing a term, 'underage women', there is no such thing.
3. There is no such thing as 'sex with a child', it is called child rape or child sexual abuse.

Stop minimising the criminality.

This image is a screenshot of a Twitter (X) post by user @PaperWhispers (Dr Ruby). The post delivers a sharp, serious critique of mainstream media terminology used in coverage of the Jeffrey Epstein files, making three core arguments:
1. Challenging the press for referring to minor girls as 'women'
2. Rejecting the invented term 'underage women' as a non-existent, inappropriate phrase
3. Insisting that the phrase 'sex with a child' be replaced with accurate, explicit terms like 'child rape' or 'child sexual abuse'

The post concludes with a direct demand: Stop minimising the criminality. The user's circular profile photo (showing a neutral, forward-facing portrait of Dr Ruby) appears at the top left of the screenshot.

The image originates as an original tweet from the platform Twitter (now rebranded as X), posted by user Dr Ruby (@PaperWhispers). It was reposted on the platform 9Gag, as indicated by the provided source information, with the original title 'Criminally'. The image is an unedited screenshot of the original social media post, with no remixing, editing, or alteration to the original text or visual elements.